Considering that prior work has mostly dedicated to self?presentation in profiles, Fitzpatrick and Birnholtz ( 2016 ) argue that scientists should spend more focus on interactions on dating apps. They delineate three phases of this interactions facilitated by dating apps. First, profile functions being a negotiation that is initial. Whenever constructing their pages, “people think less about lying or being lied to, and much more about how precisely much to show about their objectives so when in the process to show this information” (Fitzpatrick & Birnholtz, 2016, p. 22). Considering that goals can differ as time passes, stating a certain objective in a person’s profile causes it to be hard to withdraw these details later on, and retaining some ambiguity means making space to go when you look at the discussion. 2nd, chat on dating apps functions as strategic, interactive self?presentation. Users may negotiate their goals into the talk, in addition to timing of some other individual’s reply, if it is instant or delayed, may replace the movement associated with the talk and change previous expectations. Third, face?to?face meetings, facilitated by relationship on dating apps, are another phase of settlement, where users either verify or overturn the prior, online impression that they had of some other app user that is dating.
In an even more specific case, Licoppe et al. ( 2015 ) explore exactly exactly how Grindr users in France whom look for casual intimate encounters use conversation methods to circumvent development that is relational. Because they argue:
Grindr users have actually developed a specific “linguistic ideology” (Silverstein, 1979) which supplies all of them with a perfect types of just exactly what an ordinary “friendly discussion” is all about (relational development), of what type of conversational techniques help this kind of orientation (mentioning individual activities as subjects) and that they reject as unsuitable with their very own interactional purposes. (Licoppe et al., 2015, p. 2549)